Field studies · Cochrane
Ten studies found no evidence of fewer landings.
The review found no evidence that the electronic mosquito repellents it assessed reduced mosquito landings. It did not test every possible sound or phone.
A practical question · What does the evidence say?
I wondered whether a phone could play a sound that keeps mosquitoes away. The evidence I found does not support relying on electronic tones for bite protection. A phone can play a tone; that alone does not make it a repellent.
What the studies tested
Field studies · Cochrane
The review found no evidence that the electronic mosquito repellents it assessed reduced mosquito landings. It did not test every possible sound or phone.
Laboratory · 2024
The researchers tested four devices on two mosquito species. Their measured approach-to-attractant behaviour did not significantly differ with the devices on or off.
Field trial · Mali · 2026
The field study used CO₂-baited traps and a non-human test method at urban and rural sites. It did not test an iPhone or every device, species or sound.
What this means for a phone
The studies above do not establish what a particular iPhone model can emit acoustically, or that any sound it can play will deter mosquitoes. None tested the iPhone in the original question. Don’t treat an app’s tone or a high-pitched sound as proven protection.
Practical protection
Australian healthdirect recommends using an approved insect repellent containing DEET, picaridin or oil of lemon eucalyptus, and following its label. It also recommends covering exposed skin with loose-fitting clothing and reducing exposure when mosquitoes are active. Advice can vary with location, age and health circumstances.
Sources and limits
Evidence boundary: these findings do not test an iPhone or every frequency, device, species or setting. They support not relying on phone-generated sound as bite protection; they do not prove that every imaginable sound has been tested.